- Dev Dispatch
- Posts
- Guiding Decisions Based On Customer Interviews
Guiding Decisions Based On Customer Interviews
ok so you've done some customer interviews ... now what?
Hey. welcome to buy, build, grow. I’m Andrew Pierno. If you forgot how the heck you signed up for this you can start here. I mostly buy and sometimes build saas products. Right now I’m documenting zero to 1 for a new product.
I’ve been a bit delayed. We acquired a new biz (which I should be able to talk about in a week or two) and it’s a big one for us. I’ve been swamped. But I found some time to jot down some progress over the past two weeks.
TLDR;
Customer interviews are a PITA to do, but are helpful
What to do with info from your customer interviews isn’t always clear
Trying to charge for a product still seems like the only real way to validate
I’ve done 22 meetings now for Demo Monster. Doesn’t really matter what the product is (a tool to create product demos), I’m just trying to show how I’m going from 0 to 1 in real time.
Current state of the union:
The goal at this stage is to reduce uncertainty. There are currently 15 signups, zero paying customers, and zero people have shared a demo. Humble.
I’m about 12% confident this product will ever make money
“Cohort 1” as I’ll call it was ~20 people who I hopped on a call with. Mechanically I recorded the meetings in google meet, transcribed them and then used my notes to compile “insights” from each interview. Then I threw them in chat gpt and prompted my way to a problem statement:
Problem: Current product demo tools fail to effectively engage diverse audiences due to their lack of personalization, interactivity, and actionable insights, leading to reduced effectiveness in communicating the product's value and inefficiencies in onboarding and training processes.
It’s still confusing, and doesn’t lead me to 1 ICP with 1 core problem to solve, but it’s a start.
In case you go and run this yourself, prepare for these types of results:
They all stated they had a problem on the call
They all liked the solution and said it would help solve the problem
ZERO of them signed up, created a demo and shared it.
This is common. It’s annoying. Disheartening even. But common. It’s incredibly difficult to reveal actual preferences (not stated preferences). If stated preference were actual preferences, I’d have 20 paying customers by now.
My ICPs from cohort 1 were:
Saas founders
Agency owners
A few BDRs / SDRs
Agency owners seem to be the least likely to use this. Im starting to feel like sales leaders really have this problem and it is compounded when they have employees. The problem is more acute for sales leaders in software companies.
Saas founders (small companies) still look at this tool as potentially something useful in a cold email, or to send on a follow up call.
The more interesting cohort is BDRs / SDRs / Sales leaders (with sales rep) in saas companies. That’s a much more specific ICP. They had a few things in common over the interviews:
demoing consistently across your whole team is a problem
making sure you’re not just showing screens, but actually contextualizing the benefits of the software in a way the customer can understand (a bit esoteric)
Can’t customize / personalize a demo async (without a lot of work like creating a custom loom video)
No insights - they’re running blind. It’s hard to get real stats on if a loom video was watched by a particular person or not.
So for cohort 2 my hope is 1 person with a real problem creates a demo and starts to share it. For this product I have to validate both my customer (the demo creator) as well as the demo receiver. If people look at this like receiving a voice note from a loose acquaintance (i.e there’s nothing I’d rather do less than listen to a 3 minute rambling voice note) then I’m screwed.
And on that cheerful note thanks for reading and I’ll see ya next time!
AP